Invalidation Search – Why to Consider Images in a Prior Art Search?
How do I find a hidden prior art? – Doesn’t this question bug everyone when we conduct an invalidation search?
While some of us try new strategies to excavate one, other explore patent databases that have not yet been explored. To sum it up, we all rely on text to find a prior art. Isn’t it?
We all know that a picture is worth a thousand words. It is capable enough to tell a story, instigate feelings, emotions, and in some cases even serves as proof of the developments that took place.
In the world of intellectual property, you can use images and drawings as valid prior art that could help to either disqualify a patent application or challenge the validity of a granted patent. According to Title 35, Section 102 of the US law:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
In the past few years, there has been an exponential increase in the number of infringement cases as compared to the patent applications granted in the United States alone. With an increase in such cases, there is also an increase in the requirement to perform invalidation searches, and hence multiple strategies in the strategy box.
We have always considered a patent search or an invalidation search, in the current context, as an art rather than a science. This is also the reason behind our clients confidence in the invalidation searches and our motto that if it exists, we will find it.
We have identified prior art in most unusual sources; for example, in books, manuals, old data books, catalogs and even in non-digitized images found in brochures and magazines. Today we are sharing few such examples. You can take inspiration from them and include them in your next prior art search.
A Checklist to Make Your Life Easy: Download your copy of free Prior Art Search Checklist that helps keeping mistakes at bay here:
For example, if you are looking for a prior art for patents related to technologies like video conferencing or virtual reality, these images of a newspaper articles dating back to 1950s, a 1910 pictorial illustration of how technologies would work in 2000 AD, or Ericsson’s vision on how a videophone possibly would work in the future, would be very relevant in building a case.
In few cases, the images are detailed enough that they are enough to serve as valid prior art as they convey the methodology of how video communication works and the predecessors of the existing video communication technology.
Let’s dive into a totally different aspect – Shopping. The present generation is more interested in shopping online as compared to shopping in a retail store. However, Teleshopping, which is also regarded as the father of modern online shopping, has roots traced back to the late 1960s.
The below image explains the concept of online shopping. It explains the concept in such a lucid manner that any person skilled in the art can decipher how s/he can purchase products by looking at a screen via a communication medium.
Though it sounds easy, however, searching for prior art in images is a daunting task. Why? Well, the reason is explained in Section 2125 of manual of patent examining procedure which states:
Drawings and pictures can anticipate claims if they clearly show the structure which is claimed. However, the picture must show all the claimed structural features and how they are put together.
Hence, if an image contests the validity of a patent, it’s important that the image in question illustrates all of the claimed features in such a manner that a person skilled in the art could identify the similarity between the two.
For instance, the following images when put together uncovers the technologies which had been put together with additional features to make the present day Smartphone. Features such as digital camera, music player, calling facilities, touch screen, messenger when were put together, formed the very basis of a Smartphone.
This further highlights the importance of including non-patent literature (NPL) found during a prior art search. Citing such NPLs in a patent application can negate the chances of unnecessary litigation.
With proper citations and making prior art public in the patent office could help make your case stronger. Moreover, if you have such information while you receive a notice, it also removes the possibility of getting into litigation. It’s always better to be safe than sorry.
Conclusion: You can find most of the prior art for the present day technologies in images and pictures. While conducting a validity or invalidity search, if finding patent related literature is difficult, it is always best to look at images.
Images aren’t only capable of successfully illustrating an idea, but also capable of providing information, which could hardly be found in text. A picture is worth thousand words. True indeed.
Next Step: Explore more patent invalidation strategies and create your own smart patent invalidation strategy using these tactics.
How useful was this post?
Click to rate!
Oh Crap! We're sorry this post wasn't of much help to you!
Help us make it better.
You are an angel! Thank for the feedback 🙂