fbpx
December 7, 2019 +1-202-455-5058 sales@greyb.com Intellectual Property Services
  • About
    • Vision
    • Careers
  • Services
    • Client Stories
    • Search Solutions
    • Infringement Solutions
    • Market Research
    • Technology Landscaping Solutions
  • Labs
    • Labs
    • Playground
  • Resources
    • Slideshares
    • Reports
    • Guides
    • Webinars
    • Thesis and Dissertations Repository
  • Patent Strategy Blog
    • Patent Strategy Blog
    • R&D Blog
    • Life Inside GreyB
    • What industry experts are reading?
  • Contact
    World Leading Technology Research Firm
    • About
      • Vision
      • Careers
    • Services
      • Client Stories
      • Search Solutions
      • Infringement Solutions
      • Market Research
      • Technology Landscaping Solutions
    • Labs
      • Labs
      • Playground
    • Resources
      • Slideshares
      • Reports
      • Guides
      • Webinars
      • Thesis and Dissertations Repository
    • Patent Strategy Blog
      • Patent Strategy Blog
      • R&D Blog
      • Life Inside GreyB
      • What industry experts are reading?
    • Contact
     Unitary Patent Court and the Global Patent Market

    Unitary Patent Court and the Global Patent Market

    1

    After traveling together on a long road for 43 years, on 19 Feb 2013, the 25 member states signed a deal to end the regime of “bundled patent” system by setting up a Unitary Patent Court in Europe. The agreement is a major landmark that will affect the population of 400 million across member states.

    Since the agreement has already been agreed upon, there has been a lot of discussions on its impact on patenting in Europe. UPC, however, is not only going to affect the European patent market, it has its global implications – both positive and negative – which I’ve tried to cover below.

    The Downsides

    The possible downside of UPC as per my anticipations could be:

    UPC may bring Licensing Issues

    The UPC complicates the licensing process for a patent holder. He has to decide whether he wants to stay or wants to opt-out from the UPC before licensing his inventions, which could be a contentious topic between a licensor and a licensee.

    The UPC will bring licensing issues between a patent owner and a licensee. A patent owner, anytime during the seven years transition period, can opt-out from the UPC jurisdiction. However, there isn’t any such provision for a licensee or an exclusive licensee.

    This could bring different issues to the table for licensors and licensees. An exclusive licensee, for example, in the case of filing an injunction against an infringer may not want the owner to opt out as it prevents him from seeking a pan-Europe injunction. On the other hand, in the case of a successful counter-claim, he may want the owner to opt out to prevent losing his rights over the whole jurisdiction.

    Other than that, in case an exclusive licensee brings an action in the UPC, it will bar the owner to opt-out from the UPC anytime in the future. Thus, to avoid such an instance, licensors would like to have an agreement in place preventing licensees to bring any action to the UPC before their prior consent. A licensor, on the flip side, would like to exercise some control.

    UPC have some Litigation Issues to be fixed

    In February, during IAM’s conference on Winning Strategies for the UPC Regime, Margot Fröhlinger, principal director of patent law at the EPO – who was one of the speakers – gave attendees insights of the new system. The conference brought issues related to patent litigation in the UPC in light.

    Given that the panel in UPC consists of three judges – two experienced and one inexperienced, and decision histories of judges is available, attorneys representing the case could predict the outcomes with a higher accuracy. Other than that, unlike the US, there is no eBay type test to decide to what extent an injunction is to be awarded to a plaintiff.

    Double Patenting

    Another issue that UPC will bring is of double patenting – two patents disclosing the same invention, in the same territory under same effective date. At present, many countries have different provisions to prevent dual patenting. For example, in Germany when an inventor files bundled patents under EPC, the national patent loses its significance automatically while in the UK, Comptroller, under Section 73(2), can cancel a national patent.

    The UPC is bringing new issues related to the rule governing the relationship between a duplicate unitary patent and a national patent. Recently a draft regulation proposed that in Germany, a national patent will remain valid if UPC doesn’t have exclusive competence on it. The Article II, Section 18, of the draft also prevents an infringer from getting sued twice.

    The response to the issue by another member state especially the UK is being awaited.

    Absence of the Supreme Court or Cour de Cassation

    UPC consists of a Court of First Instance and a Court of Appeals. There will be no Supreme Court in their structure which could get the things correct that lower courts get wrong. SCOTUS, for example, has a long-standing history of getting things right when the Federal circuit got them wrong.

    Question mark on the Quality of a Patent Litigation

    The new unified court guarantees its user to provide them with the highest quality of proceeding and judgment which seems otherwise. The article 15 of UPCA mandates judges to be experienced in patent litigation. There is also a training program of 120 hours for an inexperienced judge. The catch, however, is that there is no mandate of this type for the representative which means that a divorce attorney could represent a patent infringement case.

    This surely put a question mark on the proceedings. Given that an experienced party will choose an experienced attorney, however, the situation could be different for an independent patent owner or SME with little or no insights.

    The Brighter Side

    The brighter side of the UPC could be:

    Encourages Patent Filing in European Countries

    The UPC will make protecting inventions in Europe way easier and cheaper than before. An inventor will be able to save up to US $28720.90 per patent in translation cost alone. Also, as per Vince Cable, Dept. of Business Innovation and Skills, UK, it will bring an additional £200 million to the UK’s economy.

    The jurisdiction of UPC will cover a market with the largest GDP than any other jurisdiction in the world. This will make patent enforcement under its jurisdiction equivalent to that of the US. Patent litigation under the UPC will cover almost whole of Europe and will save a patent holder from bringing multiple actions in different countries.

    Swift and Thrift Litigation Procedure

    Europe’s most experienced judges are going to apply for becoming a UPC judge, which can guarantee, to a large extent, fair litigation verdicts. One of the most striking features of UPC is that its Rule of Procedure contains strict guidelines to ensure swift litigation procedure. Other than that, the court has provisions to adjust fee as per the commercial interests of a case. This will help SMEs to enforce and defend their rights effectively.

    Conclusion

    UPC has its set of pros and cons. It’s only a matter of time before we find out whether the system works out for better or for worse. Till then, let’s wait and watch.

    Authored By: Nitin Balodi, Senior Research Analyst, Market Research 

    Share via:

    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • More
    Unitary Patent Court and the Global Patent Market2016-04-012018-06-22https://www.greyb.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gb_-_only_green_logo.pngGreyBhttps://www.greyb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/unified-patent-court.jpg200px200px
    Comments
    pingbacks / trackbacks
    • Another Final Nail in the UPC Coffin: UK General Election | Techrights

      […] It’s another barrier for the UPC, which “complicates the licensing process for a patent holder.” To quote a portion of the corresponding new analysis: […]

      April 19th, 2017 05:11 PM

    Leave a Comment
    Cancel reply

    Explore more smart patent prosecution strategies:

    Negative Claim Limitation Sounds Positive Now in Patents!!

    Is Your Patent Prosecution Strategy Smart Enough?

    Reasons of Low Quality Patent Filings and Ways to Avoid them

    Patent Examiner Analytics Can Save Your Time and Money – Here’s How!

    One Weird Trick to Beat Alice Rejections (Examiners HATE This!)

    The Art of Smart Patent Filing – Strategies Inspired from Sun Tzu
    Featured Webinar

    Disclaimer

    The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by GreyB and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

    REACH OUT
    • UNITED STATES
    • +1-202-455-5058
    • SINGAPORE
    • +65 84306322
    Project related Queries
    • Deepak Syal (Director)
    • +91-9878711122
    • Chakshu Kalra (Director)
    • +91-9878481471
    Hiring Related Queries
    • Pooja Sehgal (HR)
    • 0172-5168031
    • hr@greyb.com
    GreyB
    GreyB Services  © 2019
    Privacy Policy
    • About Us
    • PATENT STRATEGY BLOG
    • Contact Us
    Contact Us

    Got Questions! Queries! Send us an email.

    Not readable? Change text. captcha txt
    • 0 Twitter
    • 0 LinkedIn
    • More Networks
    Share via
    Facebook
    Twitter
    LinkedIn
    Mix
    Pinterest
    Tumblr
    Skype
    Buffer
    Pocket
    VKontakte
    Xing
    Reddit
    Flipboard
    MySpace
    Delicious
    Amazon
    Digg
    Evernote
    Blogger
    LiveJournal
    Baidu
    NewsVine
    Yummly
    Yahoo
    WhatsApp
    Viber
    SMS
    Telegram
    Facebook Messenger
    Like
    Email
    Print
    Copy Link
    Powered by Social Snap
    Copy link
    CopyCopied
    Powered by Social Snap